When Buyers are shifting from traditional search engines to AI chatbots:
GEO and How SEO · SEM · Paid Ads work with it
▶ Prefer video? Watch the 3-minute recap
Four-channel comparison table + relationship map + where each channel sits in the B2B marketing funnel
- Definition · Platforms
- How it works
- Onsite: Technical · Content
- Off-site: PR media and Link building
- Brand Accuracy
- Measurement
GEO×SEO · SEO×SEM · GEO×SEM
SAP scenario cards
A0One question, four ways to be seen
A CFO at a mid-sized trading company in Hong Kong wants to replace her old SAP ECC system. She might look for answers like this:
First she sees the sponsored ads at the top, then the AI summary. The organic results come further down.
She gets one combined answer + 3–5 company names + source links. Often she does not click through to any website.
She is not searching. But in her feed she sees a sponsored post: "ECC maintenance ends in 2027. Are you ready?" It comes with a migration white paper.
A1Four channels compared in one table
Channels where the user searches or asks (SEO, SEM Ads, GEO), and channels where the platform pushes content to the user (Paid Ads)
| Aspect | SEO Search engine optimisation | SEM Ads Paid search ads | GEO ★ Generative engine optimisation | Paid Ads Paid media (not search) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| In one sentence | Get your pages high in the organic ranking | Pay to buy ad space in search results (and next to AI answers) | Get AI to mention you, cite you and describe you correctly when it writes an answer | Pay to push content to chosen audiences |
| Where on the screen | Blue links below the ads, the map pack, "People also ask" | Results marked "Sponsored" at the top / bottom of the results page; sponsored slots inside AI answers (availability differs across the three markets) | The answer box in AI Overview / AI Mode; the answer text and source cards in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot and Gemini | LinkedIn feed, InMail, website banners, YouTube pre-roll ads |
| What triggers it | The user searches (pull) | The user searches (pull) | The user asks (pull). Questions are longer and more specific | The platform pushes based on user profiles (push) |
| Main funnel stage | Research → comparison | Comparison → decision (high-intent keywords); campaign promotion | Research → Shortlist → checking | Awareness → nurturing (ABM, remarketing) |
| Main platforms | Mainly Google; Bing; Yahoo in Taiwan and Japan; Naver in Korea | Google Ads; Microsoft Advertising (Yahoo search ads in Taiwan also run here); ChatGPT ads | Google AI Overviews / AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Copilot, Gemini, Claude | LinkedIn Ads (first choice for B2B), Meta, YouTube, programmatic display |
| How you pay | No media cost. The cost is content + technical work + people | Mostly pay per click (CPC) | No media cost. You cannot buy a recommendation. The cost is content + off-site PR + tracking tools | CPM / CPC; LinkedIn prices are high |
| Media type | Owned (website) + earned (ranking) | Paid |
| Paid |
| How much you control | Medium: the algorithm decides the ranking | High: you control bids, ad text and budget | Low: every answer can be different. You can only raise the odds | High |
| How fast it works | Weeks to months. For B2B, look at trends by quarter | Same day | Technical fixes and off-site mentions can show changes within weeks. Getting onto the "recommended list" reliably usually takes months | Same day |
| After you stop investing | Fades slowly. The content assets stay | Drops to zero at once | Keeps some momentum: the live search part changes with content freshness; the model memory part fades more slowly | Drops to zero at once |
| Main KPIs | Organic clicks, impressions, rankings, organic leads | CTR (click-through rate), CPC, conversion rate, CPL (cost per lead), opportunities / signed deals | Mention rate, citation share, share of voice (SoV) against competitors, answer accuracy, traffic from AI sources | CPM, CTR, CPL, engagement from target accounts |
| Team owner | SEO / content + web development | Performance marketing (paid media team) | Cross-team: content + SEO + PR / brand. Needs one overall owner | Paid media / ABM |
| Typical use for SAP partners | Get product pages, industry pages and case pages to rank | High-intent keywords such as "SAP partner Hong Kong"; sign-ups for migration webinars | When AI is asked to "recommend an SAP partner", it mentions you and states your credentials correctly | Push case studies and webinars to CFOs / CIOs on your target account list |
- Type of investment: SEM and Paid Ads "rent" traffic. When you stop paying, it stops. SEO and GEO "buy" assets. They are slow, but they build up. A healthy mix uses rented traffic to carry you until the assets are built.
- Different stages: in B2B, you often win or lose at the Shortlist step. SEM can put you on the search page. But you cannot buy a place on the AI's shortlist. Only GEO can earn it.
- How much you control: GEO is the least controllable. So you need tracking and a benchmark (see B8). Otherwise the usual complaint is "we are doing GEO but cannot see progress".
A2How the four channels connect ⏱ 2′
A3The goal moves from "being clicked" to "being mentioned and cited" ⏱ 1′
| Traditional search | AI answers | |
|---|---|---|
| What the user types | 2–4 keywords: SAP partner HK | A full question with background and conditions: "We are a trading company with 200 staff. Our ECC support ends next year. Which partners in Hong Kong have done a similar migration?" |
| What they get | 10 links. The user opens and compares them | One combined answer + a few recommended names + 3–10 sources |
| What you compete for | Ranking → click | Being mentioned → being described correctly → being cited (with a link) → being clicked |
| Who does the comparing | The user | The AI. It uses everything it has read, including what others say about you |
| Group | Sections | Questions it answers |
|---|---|---|
| ① Understand it | B1 Definition and terms · B2 Platform landscape · B3 How AI answers are made | What is GEO? On which platforms does it happen? How does AI choose sources? |
| ② Three layers | B4 Technical layer · B5 Content layer · B5.1 Content strategy · B6 Off-site layer | Make sure AI can get in, can understand you, and can trust you |
| ③ Measure and correct | B7 Content accuracy · B8 Measuring and tracking | What to measure, how to measure it, and what to do when AI gets you wrong |
| ④ SAP partners | B9 GEO for SAP partners | What is special about the SAP ecosystem? |
B1GEO is SEO, extended to the age of AI answers ⏱ 1′
GEO (Generative Engine Optimisation): getting AI to mention you, cite you, and describe you correctly when it writes an answer.
| GEO | Name from a 2023 academic paper. The most common term today |
| AEO | Answer Engine Optimisation. First meant featured snippets and voice assistants. Now means AI answers in general |
| LLMO | LLM Optimisation. Focuses on large language models. Same meaning |
| AIO | Easy to confuse: some people mean AI Optimisation, but in SEO it more often means Google AI Overviews. Best avoided |
| AI SEO | General term |
Google published a guide on optimising for generative AI in 2026. It accepts that terms like AEO and GEO exist. But it says optimising for AI search is still, at its core, optimising the search experience. In its own words: "thus still SEO".
So, in line with the official position, we present GEO as "an extension of SEO", not a brand-new mystery.
Source: Google · Optimizing for generative AI in Google Search (updated 10 Jul 2026)
B2AI search happens in three types of places ⏱ 3′
- Google AI Overviews: the AI summary at the top of the results page
- Google AI Mode: a chat-style mode inside Search
- AI summaries in Bing / Copilot Search
Key point: the user is still "searching". The AI summary sits on the same screen as links and ads
- ChatGPT (including search)
- Gemini
- Perplexity
- Microsoft Copilot
- Claude, Meta AI, Grok and others
Key point: the user is "chatting". Questions are longer, and AI gives a list of recommendations directly
- Perplexity Comet
- Gemini in Chrome
- ChatGPT agent
- Google's browser agent (Project Mariner)
Key point: AI browses, compares and fills in forms for the user
Number of users (2026)
App market share (Sensor Tower, May 2026): ChatGPT 46.4% (below 50% for the first time), Gemini 27.7%, Claude 10.3%. Perplexity dropped ads in Feb 2026 and moved to a subscription model.
Whether each platform is available, and how much it is used, differs a lot by market.
B3How AI answers are made: most cited answers come from a live search ⏱ 4′
How AI Answers your question? Workflow see Below
How AI Pick up passages and answer your question? AI uses two sources to answer a question. One is the model's memory (what it learned in training, up to a cut-off date). The other is live search (it searches the web on the spot). Answers with source links come mainly from live search. This is also the layer GEO can influence most.
Four facts that matter most to us
→ Content that covers related sub-questions can be cited, even if it does not rank high for the main keyword
→ Your title and first paragraph must state the point in one sentence
→ SEO for one search engine alone does not cover everything
→ Measure the "appearance rate across many samples", not a single screenshot (see B8)Search sources for each platform (Oct 2026, with how officially confirmed each one is)
B4(*Optional) Technical layer: make sure AI can get in and read your pages ⏱ 1′
This is the first of the three layers, which is technical SEO. If basic technical SEO has problems, your content and off-site work are wasted. This layer is the fastest to show results and the cheapest.
Worth noting: most partner websites have few technical SEO problems. The agency or the website tech team usually handles this layer, not the marketing team.
- Should you notice any 404 errors or page rendering/loading issues on your partners' sites, raise them case by case with the agency or website team, and run a site audit (crawl, rendering, status codes) to find the cause.
There are three types of AI crawler, and each does a different job
| Type | What it does | Examples (user-agent) | What happens if you block it |
|---|---|---|---|
| ① Training | Collects data to train models. Affects the AI's "memory" | GPTBot ClaudeBot CCBot meta-externalagent; control tokens Google-Extended Applebot-Extended | Your content is left out of future training data. It does not affect their search results |
| ② Search index | Builds the index for AI search. Decides whether you can be cited | OAI-SearchBot Claude-SearchBot PerplexityBot Googlebot Bingbot Meta-WebIndexer | You disappear from that platform's AI search answers. B2B websites must never block these |
| ③ User-triggered | Fetches your page live when a user asks a question | ChatGPT-User Claude-User Perplexity-User Google-Agent | Most official docs say these visits may not follow robots.txt |
- "If I block GPTBot, I won't appear in ChatGPT." Wrong. GPTBot is only for training. ChatGPT search uses OAI-SearchBot.
- "If I block Google-Extended, I am out of AI Overviews." Wrong. Google-Extended does not affect search indexing. AI Overviews and AI Mode use content crawled by Googlebot. If you really want to opt out, use
nosnippet/noindex, or the "Search generative AI" switch in Search Console. That switch is available worldwide from 31 Aug 2026.
Three technical traps that people often miss
Vercel × MERJ, Dec 2024 (no new study of the same size since)
Cloudflare official blog, Jul 2025 / Jul 2026 / Sep 2026
Microsoft Advertising Blog, Oct 2025
Recommended approach for B2B websites
# Search crawlers: always allow (decides whether AI can cite you) User-agent: OAI-SearchBot Allow: / User-agent: Claude-SearchBot Allow: / User-agent: PerplexityBot Allow: / # Training crawlers: a business decision. For B2B marketing sites we usually recommend allowing them, # so models "remember" your brand and credentials User-agent: GPTBot Allow: / User-agent: ClaudeBot Allow: / # Never open admin areas, client portals, etc. User-agent: * Disallow: /admin/ Disallow: /portal/ Sitemap: https://www.example.com/sitemap.xml
- robots.txt
- CDN / WAF (Cloudflare etc.) AI bot settings: marketing and IT review them together once
- Server logs: check that OAI-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Bingbot and Googlebot visit normally (200, not 403)
- Turn off JavaScript to view the raw HTML. All core text should be there
- Key content is not hidden in images, PDFs or collapsed sections. White papers have a public summary page
- XML sitemap: update lastmod only when the content really changes
- Verify the site in Bing Webmaster Tools, and connect IndexNow
- Reduce 404 errors and redirect chains (AI crawlers hit far more 404s than Googlebot)
llms.txt, IndexNow, schema: should you use them?
| Practice | Current status and evidence | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|
| llms.txt | A proposal from 2024, not an official standard. Google says clearly that it ignores it. Ahrefs checked 137,000 domains: in May 2026, 97% of llms.txt files did not get a single request. The main readers are coding agents such as Claude Code. | Not a GEO priority. If you have a lot of technical documentation, APIs or integration guides, you can create one at low cost. |
| IndexNow | Tells Bing and other search engines when a page changes. Bing officially recommends it, so AI cites the latest version of your page. But there is no evidence that ChatGPT uses IndexNow (the old idea that "ChatGPT uses Bing" has been challenged by 2026 research). | Do it. It costs very little and clearly helps with Bing and Copilot. |
| Schema (structured data) | Google says it is not required. Bing says it helps LLMs understand content. An Ahrefs controlled study (1,885 pages that added JSON-LD) found almost no change in AI citations. Other tests show that ChatGPT and Perplexity read schema as plain text. | Do it, but for rich result eligibility and clear entity information (Organization, Service, FAQ). Do not sell it as an "AI citation booster". |
| Bing meta tags | NOARCHIVE: content is not used in AI chat answers or for training. NOCACHE: only the URL, title and snippet are shown. | B2B marketing pages usually do not need these. |
Sources: Google AI optimisation guide (Jul 2026), Ahrefs llms.txt study (Jun 2026), Ahrefs schema study (May 2026), Bing Webmaster Blog (Feb 2026 / Jul 2025 / Sep 2023), Search Engine Roundtable (Feb 2026). Details in _research/R1.
B5Content layer: write content that AI wants to cite ⏱ 4′
Where GEO comes from: what the 2023 paper tested, and what it found
Paper: Aggarwal et al., GEO: Generative Engine Optimization. The authors are from Princeton, IIT Delhi and others. Published on arXiv in Nov 2023, and formally at KDD 2024. (People often say the authors are from Georgia Tech / Allen AI. These two institutions are not in the final version.)
Method: the authors built a benchmark (GEO-bench) of 10,000 queries across 25 domains. A simulated engine took Google's top 5 results and gave them to GPT-3.5 to write an answer. The team then tested how 9 rewriting methods changed "visibility".
| Rewriting method | Change in visibility position-weighted word count | What it tells us |
|---|---|---|
| Add quotations | +41.5% | Quote experts and customer testimonials |
| Add statistics | +32.8% | Use specific numbers, not adjectives |
| Improve fluency | +28.7% | Write clearly and smoothly |
| Cite credible sources | +27.7% | Say where your data comes from |
| Use technical terms | +18.5% | B2B content can be technical |
| Make it easier to understand | +13.8% | |
| Use a more authoritative tone | +11.8% | |
| Keyword stuffing | about −8.7% | The old keyword-stuffing trick does not work here |
- Smaller sites gain more: a source originally ranked 5th gained +115% visibility after adding "cite sources". The source ranked 1st dropped −30%. Content can beat ranking.
- Limitations: the test used GPT-3.5 from 2023 and a simulated engine that read only 5 sources. That is very different from 2026 commercial systems, which often search dozens or hundreds of sources. "Visibility" is a measure the paper defined itself. It is not traffic or opportunities. Use it as a reference for how to improve content, but not as a promise of results.
Source: arXiv 2311.09735 (v3, 28 Jun 2024)
One simple test: if AI takes only this one paragraph, can it use it to answer the user directly? If yes, it is likely to be cited.
Rewrite example: an SAP partner's company description
"We are a leading, customer-centric SAP partner, committed to empowering enterprise digital transformation with innovative technology and creating outstanding value for our clients."
A generic template. No location, no credentials, no numbers, no industry. Any company could write this.
"Company X is an SAP Gold Partner in Hong Kong. Since 2008 it has implemented S/4HANA and SuccessFactors for manufacturing, trading and retail companies. It has completed more than 120 projects and has offices in Hong Kong and Shenzhen."
The numbers in this example are made up. The text gives location, partner level, year, industries, products, scale and offices. These are exactly the facts AI needs when it answers "recommend an SAP partner in Hong Kong".
Which AI preferred content practices have evidence, and we can further apply for value add
| Practice | Evidence | Strength of evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Add specific data (number of projects, timelines, savings %) | GEO paper: visibility +32.8%. Tested on Perplexity: subjective impression +37% | 🟢 Backed by research |
| Add quotations and cite credible sources (expert quotes, customer testimonials, SAP's official timelines) | GEO paper: quotations +41.5%, citing sources +27.7%. Lower-ranked websites gained the most | 🟢 Backed by research |
| Original, first-hand experience (not generic content anyone could write) | A core requirement in two official Google guides (2025 and 2026) | 🟢 Clearly stated by Google |
| Put key information in the HTML body text (not in images, PDFs or collapsed sections) | Crawler research + an official warning from Microsoft | 🟢 Research + official |
| Make real updates and keep content fresh | Ahrefs: content cited by AI is on average about 26% newer than organic search results. This is strongest for ChatGPT. Changing only the date, not the content, is something Google does not accept | 🟡 Correlation study |
| Clear structure: Q&A, lists, comparison tables | Recommended by Bing (it parses content by passage). Google says you do not need to split content into chunks for AI | 🟡 Official views differ |
| Answer first; each paragraph can stand alone | Recommended by Bing. The claim that "most citations come from the first 30% of a page" has not been checked against the original source | 🟡 Partly supported |
| Make the point clear in the title and first paragraph | Reverse-engineering research: ChatGPT usually decides whom to cite from the titles and snippets in search results alone | 🟡 Inferred by reverse-engineering |
| Author name and credentials (E-E-A-T: experience, expertise, authoritativeness, trust) | Fits Google's principles, but no research directly shows it increases AI citations | 🟠 Experience |
| Add schema | A controlled study showed almost no improvement (see B4) | 🔴 Not supported as a way to get cited |
| Keyword stuffing | GEO paper: visibility about −8.7% | 🔴 Harmful |
- Company facts page: one paragraph that clearly states location, partner level, year, industries, products and scale
- Case pages with numbers: industry, company size, problem, solution, results, go-live date
- Comparison pages: option A vs B, with honest pros and cons
- Timeline and policy update pages: ECC 2027, e-invoicing, subsidy changes, with dates and official sources
- FAQ: use the exact questions that sales teams are asked
- Original data: for example, "the average timeline of our 50 migration projects". No one else has it, so they can only cite you
- When AI answers in Traditional Chinese, it needs Traditional Chinese material to cite. An imbalance such as 55 articles in English but 24 in Traditional Chinese can make you "disappear" from Traditional Chinese prompts.
- Credentials and numbers must match across language versions. Otherwise AI may cite an old version.
- Write HK Traditional Chinese and TW Traditional Chinese separately. Do not rely on automatic Simplified-to-Traditional conversion.
Google itself says "you do not need to rewrite for AI". Our view: the practices above are simply the standard for good content. If people can understand it clearly, AI can too.
B5.1Content strategy: from "who asks, and what" to "which pages to write" ⏱ 3′
B5 is about how to write one piece of content so AI cites it. This section is about what content to write overall. This is also the value we can add for SAP partners: we turn the questions a buying committee asks AI into a content map and a set of writing briefs.
Step 1: Who asks? A buying committee, not one person
In the same ERP project, the CFO, the CIO, business teams and procurement ask AI very different questions. Each role needs a page that answers their question. Otherwise, when AI answers that role, it cites someone else.
| Role | What they care about / why they say no | Typical AI question | Sources they trust more our judgement | Content to give them | Scenario cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Owner / CEO | Growth, risk, whether peers use it | 同行業啲公司用緊咩 ERP?值唔值得上 SAP?"Which ERP do companies in our industry use? Is SAP worth it?" | Peer referrals, industry media, AI assistants | Industry page + case studies from the same industry (with numbers) | ① ⑰ ⑱ |
| CFO / finance director | TCO, maintenance fees, month-end close, compliance. Often has a veto | RISE with SAP total cost for a 300-person companyECC 延長維護要多花多少錢?"How much more does ECC extended maintenance cost?" | Accounting firms, vendor websites, AI assistants | Cost structure page + TCO checklist + timeline page | ⑤ ⑥ ⑳ |
| CIO / head of IT | Architecture, integration, clean core, security review (IT security review slows down 39% of purchases) | Brownfield vs greenfield S/4HANA for a trading company | SAP Community, LinkedIn, technical blogs | Migration method page, integration and security page, technical FAQ | ⑤ ⑮ ⑲ |
| Department head HR / shared finance / procurement | Whether the system works for their team, local compliance | SuccessFactors 計唔計到強積金?"Can SuccessFactors calculate MPF?" | Google, LinkedIn, review sites | Line-of-business solution page + local compliance page | ⑩ ⑪ ⑫ ⑬ |
| Operations lead supply chain / production | Will go-live stop the business? Is it easy to use? | 製造業導入 SAP 會不會影響出貨?"Will implementing SAP in manufacturing affect shipments?" | Industry media, trade shows, video | Industry cases + go-live method + customer video interviews | ⑰ ⑱ |
| Procurement / legal | Partner credentials, contract, SLA. The most cautious about AI: 28% trust it less because of AI errors (19% of all buyers) | Is [partner name] an SAP Gold Partner? How many S/4HANA projects? | SAP Partner Finder, official directories, review sites | Company facts page + list of certifications + proof that can be checked | ⑧ ⑨ |
"Sources they trust more" is our judgement: there is no reliable study yet that compares how each role uses AI (R6 research). Scenario card numbers refer to E1.
Step 2: What do they ask? What is the intent behind, and what should be the landing page for the search intent
| Intent | What the buyer asks | Example questions (EN / HK / TW) | Funnel stage | SEO / SEM / GEO focus | Page to write | Format AI likes to cite | Cards |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product | What is it, who is it for, old name vs new name | SAP Cloud ERP vs Cloud ERP PrivateSAP Business One 適唔適合 30 人公司?"Is SAP Business One right for a 30-person company?" | Awareness → comparison | SEO + GEO. SAP itself owns the main keywords; partners write "who it is for" | Product / solution page + old-vs-new name table | A definition sentence + "right for / not right for" list | ① ⑦ ⑯ |
| Migration | ECC support is ending: what now, which paths, how risky | ECC end of mainstream maintenance 2027 optionsECC 升級 S/4HANA 要多久?"How long does upgrading ECC to S/4HANA take?" | Awareness → choosing | Mainly SEO + GEO; SEM captures demand | Migration pillar page + timeline page + one page per sub-question | Official dates + options comparison table | ⑤ ⑥ |
| Partner | Who can do it, who is reliable, should we switch | 香港有邊幾間 SAP 顧問公司做開製造業?"Which SAP consultancies in Hong Kong work with manufacturers?" | Shortlist → checking | GEO + SEM; always defend brand keywords | Company facts page + case library + off-site directories | One-sentence facts: location, partner level, years, industries, size | ⑧ ⑨ |
| Price | How much, how long, how the subscription works | S/4HANA implementation cost Hong KongSAP B1 導入費用大概多少?"Roughly how much does an SAP B1 implementation cost?" | Comparison → choosing | SEO (cost structure page) + SEM | Cost structure page: no price list, but explain what drives the price | Cost-driver table + ranges + "why we don't publish a price list" | ③ ④ ⑥ |
| Industry | Has anyone done this in my industry? | SAP for food manufacturing SingaporeSAP 零售業案例"SAP retail case studies" | Solution → checking | SEO + GEO (case studies are the proof) | Industry page + case studies with numbers | Industry, size, problem, solution, result, go-live time | ⑰ ⑱ ⑲ |
The example questions are illustrations. Before using them, add them to your prompt library and measure a baseline with the B8 method.
Step 3: Set priorities: write these 6 page types in the first 90 days (*Below as sample)
- Company facts page (weeks 1–2): credentials, partner level, years, industries, number of projects, offices. The same facts in all three language versions. Serves the "partner" intent and procurement / legal.
- Migration pillar page + timeline page (weeks 3–4): use SAP's official dates. ECC mainstream maintenance ends in 2027. Extended maintenance runs to 2030 (+2 percentage points). The 2031–33 transition option is "not a maintenance extension". (SAP official, 2025–2026)
- Cost structure page (weeks 5–6): explain how users, scope, data migration, customisation and hosting affect the price, and say why you do not publish a price list.
- 3 industry case studies (weeks 5–8): pick the partner's 3 strongest industries. Every case has numbers and a go-live time.
- Comparison page (weeks 7–10): for example, "ECC extended maintenance vs RISE vs the transition option: which fits which company". List the pros and cons of each.
- Line-of-business and local compliance pages (weeks 9–12): SuccessFactors × MPF / Taiwan labour pension / CPF; e-invoicing × InvoiceNow / Taiwan e-invoicing.
- Put the answer first: 44% of ChatGPT citations come from the first 30% of a page (Kevin Indig, 2026).
- Give sub-questions their own pages: pages that rank for the sub-queries AI creates are 161% more likely to be cited in AI Overviews (Surfer, Sep 2026). So one page per sub-question works better than one long article that covers everything.
- And so on..
Writing brief template (one per page)
| Field | What to fill in | Example: the "ECC migration timeline" page |
|---|---|---|
| Target questions | 3–5 questions from your prompt library | What happens if we stay on SAP ECC after 2027?ECC 2027 之後仲用得唔用得?"Can we still use ECC after 2027?" |
| Role / intent / stage | Who the main reader is, and where they are in the journey | CFO + CIO · Migration · ① Problem awareness |
| First-paragraph answer | 2–3 sentences that answer the target question directly | ECC mainstream maintenance ends at the end of 2027. Companies can pay for extended maintenance to 2030, or use the transition option in 2031–33, but SAP says the latter is not a maintenance extension… |
| Facts that must appear | Official dates, partner credentials, your own numbers | SAP's official timeline (with link); "We have completed X migration projects, Y months on average" |
| Table / comparison | Structures AI can quote in one piece | Three options × cost impact × which company it suits |
| FAQ | 5–8 questions, in the words sales actually hear | "How much more does extended maintenance cost?" "How many days of downtime for brownfield?" |
| Internal links | Lead to the next step | Cost structure page, migration method page, manufacturing case study |
| Language versions | Which languages, who localises | EN + Hong Kong + Taiwan Traditional Chinese, no automatic Simplified-to-Traditional conversion |
| Expert / byline | Who provides the content, who is named as author | The partner's SAP migration consultant (with credentials) |
| Review cycle / success metric | How often to review; which numbers to watch | Every quarter; mention rate for the target questions, traffic from AI, form leads |
First map who asks and what they ask, then decide what to write. Each page covers one intent and serves at least two roles. Once it is live, add it to the prompt library and measure.
Sources: Forrester Buyers' Journey Survey (Jan 2026); G2 buyer behaviour research (Apr and Jul 2026); Semrush AI buying journey survey (Jul 2026); Kevin Indig / Growth Memo (2026); Surfer fan-out study (Sep 2026); Profound pricing page study (Sep 2026); TrustRadius 2026; Gartner Digital Markets (2025); Lily Ray (2026); SAP official maintenance timeline. Details in _research/R6.
B6Off-site layer: what others say about you matters more than what you say ⏱ 3′
Which off-site sources AI cites most:
| Source | What research found | What it means for SAP partners |
|---|---|---|
| Semrush (Mar 2026): LinkedIn is the second most cited domain. About 11% of AI answers cite it. The most cited posts are original long articles of 500–2,000 words, mostly educational and advice content. ChatGPT and AI Mode cite individual creators more often. Perplexity cites company pages more often | Consultants write expert long articles on their personal profiles. Keep the company page complete | |
| Wikipedia | Profound: Wikipedia makes up 47.9% of ChatGPT's top 10 sources (2025) | Most partners do not qualify for their own article. You can aim to be mentioned in related articles (following Wikipedia's editing rules) |
| Reddit / communities | Reddit makes up 46.7% of Perplexity's top 10 sources. But ChatGPT cut its Reddit citations sharply in Sep 2025 | Post technical blogs on SAP Community. Answer questions honestly in relevant communities (no spam posting) |
| YouTube | YouTube is also an important citation source. YouTube SEO is worth investing in too (it backs up a customer success story campaign as one of the proof points). (Note: check co-branding logo rules.) About 5.6% of all AI Overviews citations (Ahrefs, Mar 2026). YouTube mentions have the highest correlation with AI visibility | Upload webinar recordings, product demos and customer interviews to YouTube, with good titles and subtitles |
| Review sites and analysts | Perplexity prefers review and comparison sources such as G2 and Gartner | Set up profiles on suitable review / directory platforms. Collect real customer reviews |
| Official vendor sources | Small-sample study: in B2B software citations, vendor pages plus independent content make up about 79% | SAP's official SAP Partner Finder, customer stories and press releases. See B9 |
Off-site action list (from lowest to highest effort)
- Make your entity details consistent: company name, one-line description, credentials and address must be exactly the same on your website, LinkedIn, SAP Partner Finder, Google Business Profile and every directory site.
- Complete official directories: SAP Partner Finder, chambers of commerce, government pre-approved lists (if relevant).
- Joint releases with customers: case study press releases, customer posts on LinkedIn.
- Expert content: consultants' long LinkedIn articles, SAP Community blogs, YouTube demos.
- Industry media and events: guest articles, interviews, talks at SAP events, talks at industry associations.
- Digital PR: publish original data (for example, a "Hong Kong enterprise ECC migration survey") so media and others cite it.
B7Content Accuracy and brand safety: what to do when AI gets you wrong ⏱ 2′
Being mentioned by AI is only the first step. Being described wrongly is more dangerous than not being mentioned. Buyers come to the first meeting with the wrong idea, or they cross you off the shortlist straight away.
- Outdated products: AI still says you sell a product line you stopped years ago.
- Wrong credentials: wrong partner tier, certifications or founding year.
- Wrong regions: it misses a new office, or says you are a company from another market.
- Confusion with a company of the same name: many companies around the world have similar names.
- It gives you a competitor's case studies or strengths, or the other way round.
- It cites negative or outdated third-party content: old news, old forum posts.
- Model training data has a time lag. The model remembers "the old you".
- Old pages are still in the index, or old URLs still work after a redesign.
- Nobody updates third-party directories or old media articles.
- Your company name and description are written differently in different places, so AI cannot tell if it is the same company.
- Your website has no clear "company facts" source.
Correction process: find where gets wrong and correct the source
- Check regularly with brand prompts: about 10% of the prompt library, for example "What does Company X do?" or "What is the difference between X and Y?". Test once a month.
- Log the error: platform, prompt, what was wrong, the source AI cited, possible cause.
- Find the source: look at which page AI cited. Most errors come from an outdated third-party page or one of your own old pages.
- Fix the source: update or remove your own old pages. Ask third parties to update their information. For major changes (such as dropping a product line), publish a dated announcement.
- Build a "company facts page": on the About page, state clearly the founding year, partner tier, product lines, service regions, offices and customer industries. Add Organization schema (structured data that describes your company).
- Send feedback to the platform: Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT both have feedback buttons. You can submit, but a fix is not guaranteed. The real fix is still to fix the source.
- Test again: answers based on live search usually change after the source is updated and crawled again. The part that comes from the model's memory changes more slowly.
Brand safety and compliance notes
- Remove outdated or no-longer-relevant information quickly (for example, product lines you no longer sell)
- AI repeats what you write. Claims like "the only one in Hong Kong", "first" or "largest" need a source that can be checked. If AI repeats them widely and someone challenges them, it becomes a public trust problem.
- SAP trademarks and partner titles must follow SAP's partner branding rules (see the SAP ecosystem limits in D1).
- Negative content: do not try to "bury" it. Respond on the original platform, and publish updated, balanced content so AI has better sources to cite.
- Do not use hidden text or instructions aimed at AI to influence answers (prompt injection). See B10. This is manipulation. If found, it damages trust and may break platform policies.
AI factual error log
| Date | Platform | Prompt | Error | Source AI cited | Fix | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2026 | Perplexity | What does [company] do? | Still lists a discontinued product line | Old product page | 301 redirect to the new page, publish a discontinuation notice | SEO | In progress |
B8Measurement and tracking: you can only manage what you can measure ⏱ 4′
The question GEO hears most is "How do you prove it works?" In 2026, both official and third-party tools have improved a lot. But you look at rates, not rankings.
6 core metrics
| Metric | What it means | Watch out |
|---|---|---|
| Mention rate (Visibility) |
| The most important metric. Tools define it differently: some give an absolute percentage, others a score relative to competitors |
| Share of voice (SoV) |
| Example: we appear in 4 out of 10 answers, so the mention rate is 40%. But competitors are mentioned 12 times in total, so our SoV is only 25% |
| Citation share | Out of the source links attached to answers, the share that are our pages | "Mentioned by name" and "listed as a source" are two different things. Record them separately |
| Position | Where we rank when we are mentioned | The exact same order for the same prompt appears only about 1 time in 1,000. Use it as a rough guide only |
| Sentiment / accuracy | Is the description positive or negative? Are credentials, products and regions correct? | In B2B, accuracy matters most (see B7). Prepare a "fact list" and check it item by item |
| AI referral traffic and conversions | Visits that click through from AI platforms, and the leads they bring | Measure with GA4 + CRM. |
Official tools in 2026
Mention rate (Visibility)The simplest manual tracking method (for small and mid-sized B2B)
- Prompt set: 20–30 prompts per market, in four intent types: category discovery, comparison, problem solving, brand validation.
- Platforms: pick 3–4 main platforms per market.
- Repeats: run each prompt 3–5 times on each platform. Start a new chat each time. Keep the login status and region the same. Record the appearance rate.
- Frequency: one round per month. Add an extra test after major content or PR releases. Review trends every quarter.
20 prompts × 2 languages × 3 platforms × 3 runs = 360 answers per market per month.
Above about 500 answers a month, switch to a tool.
Fields to record: date, market, language, platform, prompt, run number, mentioned or not, position, sentiment, cited URLs, competitors that appear, factual errors.
Note: do not use a VPN to get around OpenAI's or Anthropic's region limits. It may break their terms of service. If the Hong Kong team needs ChatGPT results, ask colleagues in Taiwan or Singapore to run the tests, or use a tracking tool.
GEO tracking tools and starting prices (official website prices, 4 Oct 2026)
| Tool | Features | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Otterly.AI | Brand monitoring, SoV, GEO audit. Supports 50+ countries | US$29 / month (15 prompts) · $189 (100 prompts) · $489 (400 prompts) |
| Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit | Region list includes Hong Kong, Taiwan and Singapore | US$99 / month (25 prompts), +$60 for every extra 50 |
| Writesonic GEO | Tracking + content creation. The entry plan supports one market only | US$79 / month (50 prompts) |
| Similarweb AI Search | Visibility, citation analysis, AI traffic estimates | From US$99 / month |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | AI visibility index based on 449 million+ real prompts | From £40 / month (custom prompts) |
| Scrunch AI | Visibility tracking, page audits | US$250–300 / month (350 prompts) |
| Athena | Priced by number of answers. The enterprise plan has "fact inconsistency detection" | From US$295 / month |
| Peec AI | Daily tracking, sentiment, source analysis | From about €89 / month ⚠️ Price from a third-party review |
| Profound / Conductor / BrightEdge | Enterprise level, includes AI crawler analysis | Price on request (third-party estimate US$12k–150k+ / year) |
| HubSpot AI Search Grader | One-off free score. Does not support Chinese | Free (we tested it on an HK B2B brand) |
* Note for Hong Kong and Taiwan: most tools do not clearly support Traditional Chinese prompts or HK / TW / SG region settings. Check this during the trial. One study also found that in non-English ChatGPT sessions, many sub-searches run in English (the study did not cover Chinese). So you should also build presence in English third-party sources for Hong Kong and Singapore.
B9GEO for SAP partners: win at the shortlisting moment ⏱ 3′
For SAP partners, the customer has often already decided to use SAP. The real choice is "which partner". More and more buyers ask AI first at this step.
These are global figures. There is no public data yet on "ask AI first" for ERP in Hong Kong, Taiwan or Singapore.
What AI looks at when it recommends SAP partners
GEO tactics for partners
| What AI needs to read | How to write it on-site | How to prove it off-site |
|---|---|---|
| Partner tier and competencies | State it in one sentence on the company facts page, for example "SAP Gold Partner with the Cloud ERP Advanced competency". Point the sameAs field in Organization schema to SAP Partner Finder | Complete SAP Partner Finder profile, with the same wording as your website |
| What you have done (case studies) | One page per case: industry, company size, region, problem, solution, results with numbers, go-live date | Official SAP customer stories, joint press releases with customers |
| Where you serve | Name the regions in the title and first paragraph (for example "Hong Kong · Macau · South China"). Show office addresses | Google Business Profile, local chambers of commerce and directories |
| Which industries you know | Industry pages: industry pain points + SAP solution + case studies | Guest articles in industry media, talks at industry events |
| You understand policies and deadlines | Update articles on ECC 2027, e-invoicing and subsidy changes, with dates and official sources | Cited by media or accounting firms |
- At the shortlist stage you cannot buy an ad slot. You can only earn AI recommendations through GEO.
- SAP's official channels (SAP Partner Finder, news, customer stories, events) are sources AI already trusts a lot. When partners and SAP alliance managers keep them up to date together, the return is high.
- Policy changes (ECC 2027, the end of Hong Kong's Technology Voucher Programme (TVP), Singapore's PSG changing to EDGE) make AI answers go out of date. The first partner to publish an accurate update is the most likely to become the new cited source.
- SAP Partner Finder: solutions, competencies, industries and project count all updated
- Company facts page + Organization schema (sameAs pointing to SAP Partner Finder and LinkedIn)
- At least 2 case study pages with numbers for each key industry
- A table mapping old and new product names (such as Public Edition ↔ SAP Cloud ERP)
- Test brand prompts for accuracy once a month (see B7)
- Meet the SAP alliance manager once a quarter: joint case studies, events, news
C1GEO × SEO: one foundation, win twice ⏱ 5′
SEO is the foundation of GEO. When AI answers with web search, most platforms first use a search index to find candidate pages (see B3). If a page cannot be found in search, AI will almost never cite it. But "ranking" does not mean "being cited". The two differ in a few key ways.
- Make Sure pages are loading fine, no 404 pages
- Make sure your landing page content is well structured and following AI Citation preferences
One piece of content that works for both (the "dual-use content" template)
- Write the H1 as the buyer's question, for example "How long does an ECC to S/4HANA migration take? 5 key decisions for Hong Kong companies".
- Answer directly in the first paragraph, in 2–3 sentences (about 30–50 words) (answer-first). No lead-in.
- A definition sentence: "RISE with SAP is …", so AI can quote it easily.
- A comparison table: option A vs B, Private vs Public Edition.
- Data + sources: statistics from your own projects, SAP's official timelines.
- An FAQ section: the 5–8 questions sales hears most often.
- Author name and credentials + last updated date.
- Schema: Article / FAQPage / Organization. It helps with rich results and makes your entity clear. It is not a shortcut to citations (see B4).
- Internal links to service pages and case pages.
- Write the content once. It serves Google rankings, AI citations and sales material (send the FAQ straight to customers). It can also feed LinkedIn posts.
- In B2B, most of the content cost is "finding experts and getting data". Dual-use writing lets that investment work across three channels.
3. off-site work pays off twice
Industry media coverage, SAP ecosystem directories, case studies published together with customers, talks and podcasts: for SEO they bring backlinks and authority; for GEO they bring third-party mentions and sources AI can cite. So SEO and GEO should plan the off-site budget together, not as two teams doing the same work twice.
C2SEO × SEM: use the speed of paid search to build organic assets ⏱ 4′
- The Google SEM (search engine marketing) "search terms report" shows the full queries users actually typed.
- high-converting queries to SEO to build pages and directions for content writing.
- Hand over keywords with weak organic rankings to Google Ads to test their conversion value, then decide whether to invest further SEO or SEM resources.
Ranking × bidding matrix
| High business value (service, partner and migration keywords) | Low business value (general information keywords) | |
|---|---|---|
| Organic ranking top 3 | Brand keywords: keep bidding and test incrementality Non-brand keywords: lower the bid and test whether the organic ranking can capture the demand on its own | Do not bid. Maintaining SEO is enough. |
| Organic ranking low / none | SEM leads + SEO builds pages + GEO adds off-site mentions This is the typical case where all three channels work together | Skip it, or build long-tail content slowly over tim |
C3GEO × SEM: when the AI answer takes over the top of the screen ⏱ 2′
- Ads in AI positions: Some MUs already has English AI Overviews ads and ChatGPT ads. Taiwan has Traditional Chinese ChatGPT ads. In markets where they are open, if the AI answer fills the top of the screen and does not mention you, SEM is the only way to make sure you appear on the same screen. AI position ads also need no new campaign. Eligibility comes from your existing Search campaigns and landing page quality. The clear content you write for GEO also helps SEM win these positions.
- After AI mentions you, someone must catch the brand searches: when users see your name in AI, their next step is often to search your company name on Google. Rising brand search volume is a sign that GEO is working. Brand keyword SEM and your brand pages must catch these people.
- Amplify the content that gets cited: if AI often cites an article, it is seen as an "authoritative source". Promote it to target accounts with LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads. This brings more shares and off-site mentions, and the loop keeps feeding itself.
- Use SEM data to grow the prompt library: long questions in the search terms report are ready-made GEO tracking prompts.
Ads inside AI answers: availability across Asia-Pacific
| Market | ChatGPT Ads Live | ChatGPT Self-Serve | Ads in Google AIO (English) | Google Self-Serve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia (AU) | Live, 2026-04-17 | Available (by 2026-08-06 at latest) | Live, 2025-12-19 | Yes, automatic via existing campaigns |
| New Zealand (NZ) | Live, 2026-04-17 | Available (by 2026-08-06 at latest) | Live, 2025-12-19 | Yes, automatic |
| Japan (JP) | Live, 2026-06-22 | Available (by 2026-08-06 at latest) | Not available | N/A |
| South Korea (KR) | Live, 2026-06-22 | Available (by 2026-08-06 at latest) | Not available | N/A |
| Hong Kong (HK) | Not live (OpenAI does not support Hong Kong) | N/A | Not available | N/A |
| Taiwan (TW) | Live, 2026-09-23 | Unconfirmed | Not available | N/A |
| Singapore (SG) | Live, 2026-09-23 | Unconfirmed | Live, 2025-12-19 | Yes, automatic |
| Malaysia (MY) | Live, 2026-09-23 | Unconfirmed | Live, 2025-12-19 (English queries only) | Yes, automatic |
| Philippines (PH) | Live, 2026-09-23 | Unconfirmed | Live, 2025-12-19 (English queries only) | Yes, automatic |
| Indonesia (ID) | Live, 2026-09-23 | Unconfirmed | Live, 2025-12-19 (English queries only) | Yes, automatic |
| Thailand (TH) | Live, 2026-09-23 | Unconfirmed | Not available | N/A |
| Vietnam (VN) | Live, 2026-09-23 | Unconfirmed | Not available | N/A |
| Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Timor-Leste | Not live | N/A | Not available | N/A |
C4* Channel mix decision table: which stage, which budget, how soon you need results
| Buyer stage | Lead channel | Support | Typical content | What to measure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ① Trigger / awareness ECC end of support, expansion, IPO | Paid AdsGEO | SEO | Trend analysis, timelines, regulation explainers | Target account reach, content being cited |
| ② Researching options | GEOSEO | Paid Ads | Guides, comparisons, cost ranges, FAQ | Mention rate, organic traffic |
| ③ Shortlisting | GEO | SEMSEO | Company credentials page, directory listings, cases, third-party reviews | Mention rate and accuracy in partner-related prompts |
| ④ Comparing and validating | SEOGEO | SEM | Solution comparisons, customer testimonials, methodology | Position in comparison prompts, case page visits |
| ⑤ Decision / implementation | SEM | Paid Ads (remarketing) | Demo bookings, pricing discussions, implementation plans | CPL (cost per lead), opportunities, wins |
| ⑥ Expansion / renewal | SEO | Paid Ads | New modules, AI use cases, user community | Cross-sell opportunities |
D1SAP partner scenario library ⏱ 3′
② B1 vs NetSuite / Business Central / Odoo
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
③ Singapore EDGE funding for ERP (formerly PSG)
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
④ Hong Kong's Technology Voucher Programme has closed: what funding is left for ERP?
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑤ Migrating from ECC to S/4HANA
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑥ RISE with SAP cost and TCO assessment
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑦ GROW with SAP: cloud ERP for midsize companies
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑧ Choosing an SAP implementation partner (shortlisting)
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑨ Switching providers / AMS support
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑩ SuccessFactors: digital HR
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑪ Local payroll compliance: MPF / Taiwan labour pension / CPF
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑫ Taiwan e-invoicing (eGUI) integration
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑬ Singapore InvoiceNow integration
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑭ ESG: carbon data and climate disclosure
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑮ BTP: integration and extension
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑯ Joule / generative AI use cases
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑰ Manufacturing MRP / production across plants
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑱ Trading and distribution: multi-currency, multi-company
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑲ Multi-country rollout from a regional HQ
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
⑳ Upgrading the finance system before an IPO
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉑ Japan's "SAP 2027 problem": migrate or go third-party
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉒ Foreign firm's Japan subsidiary: HQ on SAP, local invoice rules
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉓ Human capital disclosure: getting group HR data in one place
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉔ ECC ends in 2027: routes for a Korean "next-generation ERP"
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉕ One HR system for overseas subsidiaries (US / Vietnam / EU)
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉖ KSSB climate disclosure + CBAM: carbon data from the ERP
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉗ After ECC 2027: how RISE works in China
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉘ Multinational's China subsidiary: staff data in global HR
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉙ Going overseas: a foreign subsidiary's first ERP
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉚ BIR e-invoicing (EIS) deadline: connecting SAP in time
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉛ BPOs and shared services: HR and payroll for thousands
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉜ Growing SMEs: from QuickBooks to Business One
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉝ MyInvois fully enforced: SMEs move from accounting software to ERP
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉞ Bursa-listed firms' first ISSB climate report
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㉟ Penang E&E plants: which path after ECC 2027?
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊱ Payday Super: fixing payroll after 1 July 2026
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊲ AASB S2 climate reporting: Group 2 and 3 data
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊳ Government bodies leaving ECC 6, data kept onshore
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊴ NZ's new leave law: is our payroll ready?
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊵ Selling to NZ government: Peppol from 1 Jan 2027
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊶ One ERP for Australia and New Zealand after ECC
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊷ GST e-invoicing on SAP ECC: patch it or move before 2027?
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊸ New labour codes: is our SAP payroll ready?
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
㊹ Outgrowing Tally: when Business One makes sense
More: keywords · SEO/SEM support · content assets · KPIs
5 limits that are special to the SAP ecosystem (they apply to every scenario)
- SAP's own website owns the top keywords. For product keywords like "S/4HANA" or "SuccessFactors", the top results are almost all sap.com. Partners should target "product + region / industry / use case / policy" keyword combinations and prompts, for example "SuccessFactors eMPF" or "電子發票 SAP 整合 (e-invoice SAP integration)".
- SAP Partner Finder is a key source AI uses to check a partner's credentials. A partner's profile page shows its solutions, competencies (7 areas × 3 levels: Essential / Advanced / Expert, plus 21 specialisations), number of delivered projects, and industries. Since Mar 2026 it also shows the support proficiency designation. Partner levels today are Basic / Silver / Gold / Platinum. There is no "Select" level. Platinum is by invitation only. Keep your Partner Finder profile complete, and use the same wording as on your website.Source: SAP Support / SAP News, Jan 2026 (updated Mar 2026)
- Product renaming spreads keywords across more terms. In its marketing, SAP now calls S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition "SAP Cloud ERP", and Private Edition "SAP Cloud ERP Private". In 2026 SAP also combined BTP, Business Data Cloud and Business AI into the "SAP Business AI Platform". Users and AI still use the old names. So your content should show the old and new names side by side. Pages that map old names to new names are also easy for AI to cite.
- How to use SAP trademarks and partner badges. When you use "SAP" or partner badges in ad copy, domain names or logos, follow SAP's partner branding guidelines.